I asked a "friend" to check out my dopey attempt at putting my dog online.
I'm glad I didn't post footage of my children...(which I'll never have b/c women find me horrifically deformed... on the inside)
HIS EMAIL/review.
On Mar 13, 2008, at 11:29 AM, Mxny ScXXXz wrote:
... there's only 2 or 3 distinct video clips within.
You need to film more video content and then use the dragging across grass as a motif to the music. If you sequence in too many still shots it looks like the video was created in effigy or for his Bar Mitzvah. Which would be equally depressing.
The editing on the first 40 seconds is great.
MY REPLY:
dude you're ridiculous.
love you.
not to be a douche, i would comment on the actual content of your... remarks, but there's no point, they're kind of... obvious.
raised an interesting point on the nature of photo vs video footage and viewing of the respective [sic] ...art(s)
are there good solutions for how to sequence single shots? interesting.. many people have tons of photos. so if there's no way to show them in a sequence w/o looking cheesy it becomes dependent on the artist to innovate! why hasn't anyone done this? have they? who knows? more importantly does god still love you if you post cheesy pics? probably but only up until a point then he gets annoyed.
effigy? you really mean that? I would tend to go with a less mass crowd burning, beating a dummy with a stick, term like...
memorial
ps my mommy liked it so fuck you!
Aren't we both?
1 comment:
you guys are all douchebags...
(I'm posting aanonymously but it's me the guy who writes the blog!)
Post a Comment